Going for Zero

The core argument of this conversation is deceptively simple: the greenest building is the one that already exists. Carl Elefante pushes us to see beyond the last 200 years of urban design and into a 6,000-year encyclopedia of city-making. He frames modern urban eras as City 1.0 and 2.0, then sketches a City 3.0 that reconnects with outcomes, community, earth, and place. That means valuing permanence, adapting buildings, and designing streets for people and climate rather than traffic and glass. It also means questioning “new is better,” especially when much of what we build is fragile, energy-hungry, and destined for the landfill.

Listen Now

Elefante’s idea of “energy slaves,” borrowed from Buckminster Fuller, lands hard. Buildings that depend on constant mechanical input for comfort are propped up by cheap energy rather than good form. Performance follows form: orientation, massing, shade, ventilation, and street trees set the baseline for comfort and efficiency. We hear examples from Yemen’s wind-catching urban forms to a D.C. school that revived stack ventilation with a solar chimney. These lessons aren’t nostalgia; they are climate tools. When design starts with passive strategies and operability, mechanical systems become a last resort, not the default, slashing operational carbon while improving resilience during outages and heat waves.

Whole-life carbon analysis emerges as the next professional standard of care. London’s reuse-first policy is a turning point: before demolition, teams must prove that replacing a structure is the least carbon-intensive option compared to reuse or reuse-plus-addition. This forces the accounting the construction industry often avoids and flips incentives toward adaptive reuse. Material choices matter, but scale matters more: two-thirds of a typical building’s carbon sits in permanent elements like concrete and steel. Preserving frames and durable facades keeps that embodied carbon in place. The Empire State Building’s retrofit contrasts with an all-glass tower’s future recladding, showing how permanence and maintainability win over time.

The financial and insurance sectors are quiet protagonists in this story. If financing rewards short-term returns and ignores health, resilience, and emissions reductions, owners will keep selecting disposable choices. Yet free transit in Iowa City demonstrates how co-benefits translate into time savings, cleaner air, and lower risk—value we rarely price correctly. Insurance is already responding to climate risk; lenders and public policy can follow by backing reuse-first projects, rewarding lower whole-life carbon, and stretching evaluation horizons from a mortgage cycle to multigenerational value. When capital aligns with climate, cities can reinvest in what lasts.

City 3.0 expands from buildings to streets. Public rights-of-way are climate infrastructure: room for trees, stormwater capture, shade, air quality, and social life. Reclaiming even a fraction of street area for green systems and people-first mobility can lower heat islands, manage floods, and cut tailpipe pollution. This is not anti-growth; it is better growth. After decades of sprawl, many cities can add gentle density through missing-middle housing, fill empty space, and retire flood-prone or ecologically sensitive areas. That reintegration strategy prioritizes neighborhood knowledge, trusts lived experience, and designs with residents rather than for them.

Education must catch up. Instead of treating history as style, schools and studios can analyze the material flows, supply chains, and climate logic behind enduring urban forms. Professional training should normalize whole-life carbon assessment, passive-first design, and adaptive reuse tactics. Owners and regulators can accelerate adoption by mandating carbon accounting and compensating teams for this work. The hopeful note, echoed throughout, is that each generation has faced existential threats and adapted. The next generation of planners and architects already “gets it.” Our task is to remove barriers, rewrite the rules, and invest in permanence. Build less disposable stuff. Use what we have well. Design form that earns performance without energy slaves. That’s City 3.0.