top of page
annie-spratt-l9cFgVl9mKo-unsplash.jpg

Reclaiming the Road

  • stephrouse21
  • Oct 28
  • 3 min read

Streets shape daily life more than any other civic asset, yet most American cities still treat them like narrow pipes for cars. This episode explores a different frame: streets as social infrastructure. Author and planner-geographer David Prytherch argues that the “complete streets” era, while necessary, hasn’t gone far enough. Designing lanes for bikes and buses matters, but mobility justice asks a broader question: who benefits, who is burdened, and whose presence is welcomed or pushed out? That shift calls for both physical changes and a cognitive reset. It means seeing the right‑of‑way—often 40% of downtown land and up to 80% of city‑owned property—as our most flexible public realm, where social connection, small business, safety, and access are co‑equal goals alongside movement. The history matters here: for millennia streets carried people and culture, not just traffic. Only in the past century, through statutes, engineering standards, and tort law, did “motordom” lock in an autocentric order. Understanding that rapid social and legal turn unlocks today’s politics and points to practical redesign pathways.

Mobility justice moves beyond mode parity to procedural and distributional equity. It tackles how design choices intersect with race, income, gender, disability, immigration, and policing. A protected bike lane can be both safety infrastructure and, in some markets, a signal of looming displacement. That’s why engagement and governance matter as much as striping. The process itself—co‑design workshops, open streets, parklets, and pop‑ups—builds civic trust and a constituency for change. Temporary tactics have radical power: sit in a lawn chair in a curbside space and you grasp the sheer volume of asphalt we’ve surrendered. Walk a centerline during an open‑street and you internalize a new social order. Those moments soften resistance, create new stakeholders, and translate into durable policy shifts: updated street design guides, default traffic‑calming programs, shared street typologies, and mobility department reorganizations that dethrone car‑first metrics.


Designing for “messy shared space” is counterintuitive yet effective. Traditional traffic engineering seeks frictionless flow; great public spaces embrace choreography. The Dutch woonerf and “naked streets” show how deliberate complexity—chicanes, trees, seating, frequent crossings, varied textures—slows drivers more reliably than signs or sporadic enforcement. Visual cues, edge friction, and human presence produce self‑enforcing safety. That translates into scalable tactics for American blocks: neighborhood greenways that parallel arterials, default 20–25 mph limits paired with speed humps, daylighted corners, continuous sidewalks across side streets, and curb‑level plazas that flex between deliveries, commerce, and play. Crucially, these interventions are lower cost than big capital rebuilds and can be targeted where crash risk and social need are highest.


Equity in delivery requires mixing bottom‑up and plan‑driven approaches. Request‑only programs tend to concentrate in higher‑income areas with time, contacts, and business improvement districts. A fairer model blends wide engagement with data‑led prioritization: allocate traffic calming, safe crossings, and open‑street hours to corridors near schools, transit, elder housing, and where serious injuries cluster. Make the rules transparent, the designs repeatable, and the maintenance funded. Boston’s pivot is instructive: after neighborhood plans proved slow and expensive, the city standardized speed humps as a universal safety tool on local streets—no special charrettes required—freeing capacity for deeper engagement on complex corridors. Queens’ 34th Avenue offers the community‑powered complement: during the pandemic, residents organized an open street that evolved into a permanent sequence of plazas and slow ways, with programming that reflects the neighborhood—ESL classes, vendor tables, and joyful social life. Together, these examples show how pop‑ups seed policy, policy scales equity, and both together reclaim the road for people.

Comments


Stay up to date with latest episodes and news

Thanks for submitting!

FOLLOW US

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • White Facebook Icon

© 2021 by A Podcast of the Nebraska Chapter of the American Planning Association

For episode ideas or general inquiries, please get in touch

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page