Building for People

Urban planning is undergoing a significant transformation as professionals and researchers look to reimagine the ways in which cities can develop sustainably. In a recent episode of Booked on Planning, we had the pleasure of interviewing Michael Eliason, author of “Designing for People: Designing Livable, Affordable, Low-Carbon Communities.” Eliason shares invaluable insights into the eco-district model—an approach that prioritizes community, sustainability, and livability in urban design, setting it apart from traditional models of development.

One of the key distinctions Eliason makes is the difference between eco-districts and traditional transit-oriented development (TOD). While both concepts aim to create more sustainable urban environments, he argues that eco-districts go a step further. In the U.S., TOD often remains auto-centric, with a disregard for noise planning and community cohesion. In contrast, many cities in Europe and parts of Asia have embraced eco-districts, which prioritize green space, social equity, and the creation of environments that enhance quality of life. Through examples like Hamburg, which incorporates green loops and ecologically-focused community spaces, readers gain a clearer understanding of how urban planning can evolve.

Eliason also introduces the concept of “Baugruppen,” which refers to self-developed urban co-housing models. These cooperative approaches to development allow communities to come together, determining their needs and priorities. He emphasizes that in order to facilitate innovation within the U.S. building industry, we need to reconsider our building codes and embrace new models that encourage community development instead of limiting it. The book emphasizes the necessity for thoughtful urban design and the importance of integrating community-centric features into new developments.

Throughout the book, Eliason highlights the ongoing struggle for change faced by urban planners in the U.S. due to restrictive building codes. Unlike in other countries—where codes are generally less complex and more conducive to creative urban design—American planning often gets bogged down in bureaucracy. This leads to a stagnation of innovative solutions. Eliason notes that adapting building codes could ease some of the development pressures and allow for a shift towards more sustainable practices.

The cost of construction in the U.S. is another hurdle. Eliason explains that a myriad of factors—from labor costs to restrictive building regulations—drive up expenses. This creates a barrier to affordable housing and innovative urban design. He mentions how European countries have a long history of urban living that fosters cost-effective construction, whereas American cities are still grappling with the repercussions of mid-20th-century decisions promoting sprawl.

One chapter in the book delves into the notion of “sponge cities,” a concept rooted in flood and stormwater management that utilizes blue-green infrastructure to address climate change impacts. This innovative approach allows cities to better absorb rainfall while also enhancing the quality of urban spaces, making them more livable. Eliason advocates for U.S. cities to adopt such eco-district designs to ensure resilience and sustainability.

Ultimately, the book serves to inspire urban planners and citizens alike to think critically about how communities can be designed better. The blend of eco-district principles, collaborative housing models, and a re-evaluation of building regulations could lay the groundwork for more livable cities. As we continue to grapple with urban challenges, it’s essential to rethink our approach to planning and development, prioritizing people and community over automobiles and efficiency.

Listen to Episode